Tennessee Tech
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,382  Purity Murray JR 22:02
1,446  Sarah Brandt JR 22:05
1,553  Jenna Storms FR 22:13
2,069  Sonel Bezuidenhout FR 22:47
2,266  Madison Stremler FR 23:04
2,723  Angela Jepchirchir ? 23:53
National Rank #243 of 339
South Region Rank #29 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Purity Murray Sarah Brandt Jenna Storms Sonel Bezuidenhout Madison Stremler Angela Jepchirchir
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/03 1278 22:31 21:35 21:34 22:49 23:21 23:57
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1278 21:42 22:02 22:09 23:00 22:51 24:03
Ohio Valley Conference Championships 10/31 1275 21:53 22:12 22:37 22:36 22:54 23:44
South Region Championships 11/13 1300 22:13 22:42 22:31 22:47 23:18 23:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.4 808 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.9 3.3 5.6 10.4 12.3 16.0 16.8 14.7 8.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Purity Murray 129.9
Sarah Brandt 135.0
Jenna Storms 146.8
Sonel Bezuidenhout 189.6
Madison Stremler 205.2
Angela Jepchirchir 239.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 0.0% 0.0 20
21 0.2% 0.2 21
22 0.7% 0.7 22
23 1.9% 1.9 23
24 3.3% 3.3 24
25 5.6% 5.6 25
26 10.4% 10.4 26
27 12.3% 12.3 27
28 16.0% 16.0 28
29 16.8% 16.8 29
30 14.7% 14.7 30
31 8.6% 8.6 31
32 5.0% 5.0 32
33 2.6% 2.6 33
34 1.1% 1.1 34
35 0.5% 0.5 35
36 0.2% 0.2 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0